Study Attribute | Value |
---|---|
CEBS Accession Number: | 002-03251-0022-0000-7 |
Chemical Name: | Cell Phone Radiation: GSM |
CASRN: | CELLPRADGSM |
NTP Study Type: | Genetic Toxicology - Micronucleus |
NTP Study ID: | G08013B |
Strain and Species: | Harlan Sprague Dawley Rat |
Study Result: | Male: Negative; Female: Negative |
Blood
Start Date | Sample Collection Time | Sex | Cell | Methodology Used | Dosing Regimen | Route | Trend Test P-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012-12-20 | 1 hour | Male | PCE | Flow Cytometry | Whole Body Exposure x 94, 94 day | Whole Body Exposure | 0.985 |
Dose (w/kg) | Number of Animals Scored | Mean MN-PCE/1000 PCE ± SEM | Pairwise P | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vehicle Control | Air | 0 |
5 | 0.840 ± 0.097 | |||
Test Chemical | Cell Phone Radiation: GSM | 1.5 |
5 | 0.610 ± 0.109 | 0.920 | ||
3 |
5 | 0.600 ± 0.106 | 0.961 | ||||
6 |
5 | 0.490 ± 0.078 | 0.972 |
Start Date | Sample Collection Time | Sex | Cell | Methodology Used | Dosing Regimen | Route | Trend Test P-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012-12-20 | 1 hour | Male | PCE | Flow Cytometry | Whole Body Exposure x 94, 94 day | Whole Body Exposure | 0.123 |
Dose (w/kg) | Number of Animals Scored | Mean Percent PCE ± SEM | Pairwise P | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vehicle Control | Air | 0 |
5 | 0.946 ± 0.051 | |||
Test Chemical | Cell Phone Radiation: GSM | 1.5 |
5 | 1.032 ± 0.030 | 0.352 | ||
3 |
5 | 1.000 ± 0.062 | 0.425 | ||||
6 |
5 | 1.082 ± 0.058 | 0.114 |
Start Date | Sample Collection Time | Sex | Cell | Methodology Used | Dosing Regimen | Route | Trend Test P-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012-12-20 | 1 hour | Male | NCE | Flow Cytometry | Whole Body Exposure x 94, 94 day | Whole Body Exposure | 0.911 |
Dose (w/kg) | Number of Animals Scored | Mean MN-NCE/1000 NCE ± SEM | Pairwise P | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vehicle Control | Air | 0 |
5 | 0.334 ± 0.109 | |||
Test Chemical | Cell Phone Radiation: GSM | 1.5 |
5 | 0.143 ± 0.036 | 1.000 | ||
3 |
5 | 0.079 ± 0.015 | 1.000 | ||||
6 |
5 | 0.130 ± 0.021 | 1.000 |
Blood
Start Date | Sample Collection Time | Sex | Cell | Methodology Used | Dosing Regimen | Route | Trend Test P-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012-12-20 | 1 hour | Female | PCE | Flow Cytometry | Whole Body Exposure x 94, 94 day | Whole Body Exposure | 0.566 |
Dose (w/kg) | Number of Animals Scored | Mean MN-PCE/1000 PCE ± SEM | Pairwise P | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vehicle Control | Air | 0 |
5 | 0.620 ± 0.073 | |||
Test Chemical | Cell Phone Radiation: GSM | 1.5 |
5 | 0.610 ± 0.104 | 0.519 | ||
3 |
5 | 0.700 ± 0.084 | 0.495 | ||||
6 |
5 | 0.590 ± 0.066 | 0.525 |
Start Date | Sample Collection Time | Sex | Cell | Methodology Used | Dosing Regimen | Route | Trend Test P-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012-12-20 | 1 hour | Female | PCE | Flow Cytometry | Whole Body Exposure x 94, 94 day | Whole Body Exposure | 0.008 |
Dose (w/kg) | Number of Animals Scored | Mean Percent PCE ± SEM | Pairwise P | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vehicle Control | Air | 0 |
5 | 0.659 ± 0.078 | |||
Test Chemical | Cell Phone Radiation: GSM | 1.5 |
5 | 0.764 ± 0.073 | 0.376 | ||
3 |
5 | 0.737 ± 0.092 | 0.455 | ||||
6 |
5 | 0.992 ± 0.033 | 0.010 |
Start Date | Sample Collection Time | Sex | Cell | Methodology Used | Dosing Regimen | Route | Trend Test P-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012-12-20 | 1 hour | Female | NCE | Flow Cytometry | Whole Body Exposure x 94, 94 day | Whole Body Exposure | 0.737 |
Dose (w/kg) | Number of Animals Scored | Mean MN-NCE/1000 NCE ± SEM | Pairwise P | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vehicle Control | Air | 0 |
5 | 0.131 ± 0.044 | |||
Test Chemical | Cell Phone Radiation: GSM | 1.5 |
5 | 0.202 ± 0.039 | 0.377 | ||
3 |
5 | 0.110 ± 0.015 | 0.447 | ||||
6 |
5 | 0.127 ± 0.029 | 0.476 |