Title: Cervicoisthmic cerclage: transabdominal vs transvaginal approach.

Authors: Witt, Marili U; Joy, Saju D; Clark, Jennifer; Herring, Amy; Bowes, Watson A; Thorp, John M

Published In Am J Obstet Gynecol, (2009 Jul)

Abstract: We sought to compare the outcomes of cervicoisthmic (CI) cerclage using traditional transabdominal (TA) approach vs the lesser used transvaginal (TV) approach.We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent placement of a CI cerclage.Before CI placement, the abdominal group had a total of 100 pregnancies that continued beyond the first trimester and had 27 (27%) surviving infants. After cerclage placement, there were 34 pregnancies and 24 (71%) surviving infants. Before cerclage placement, the vaginal group had a total of 90 pregnancies that continued beyond the first trimester and had 11 (12%) surviving infants. After cerclage placement, there were 29 pregnancies and 20 (69%) surviving infants. The vaginal cerclage group had a significantly shorter mean operative time of 33 vs 69 minutes, and shorter hospital stay of 0.5 vs 3.2 days.Both TV and TA CI cerclage offers select patients with cervical insufficiency improved neonatal survival. The TV placement of a CI has less morbidity than the TA approach with a comparable neonatal survival.

PubMed ID: 19376490

MeSH Terms: Cerclage, Cervical/methods*; Female; Humans; Length of Stay; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome*; Retrospective Studies