Title: The fractal geometry of bronchial trees differs by strain in mice.

Authors: Glenny, Robb W; Krueger, Melissa; Bauer, Christian; Beichel, Reinhard R

Published In J Appl Physiol (1985), (2020 02 01)

Abstract: Fractal biological structures are pervasive throughout the plant and animal kingdoms, with the mammalian lung being a quintessential example. The lung airway and vascular trees are generated during embryogenesis from a small set of building codes similar to Turing mechanisms that create robust trees ideally suited to their functions. Whereas the blood flow pattern generated by these fractal trees has been shown to be genetically determined, the geometry of the trees has not. We explored a newly established repository providing high-resolution bronchial trees from the four most commonly studied laboratory mice (B6C3F1, BALB/c, C57BL/6 and CD-1). The data fit a fractal model well for all animals with the fractal dimensions ranging from 1.54 to 1.67, indicating that the conducting airway of mice can be considered a self-similar and space-filling structure. We determined that the fractal dimensions of these airway trees differed by strain but not sex, reinforcing the concept that airway branching patterns are encoded within the DNA. The observations also highlight that future study design and interpretations may need to consider differences in airway geometry between mouse strains.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Similar to larger mammals such as humans, the geometries of the bronchial tree in mice are fractal structures that have repeating patterns from the trachea to the terminal branches. The airway geometries of the four most commonly studied mice are different and need to be considered when comparing results that employ different mouse strains. This variability in mouse airway geometries should be incorporated into computer models exploring toxicology and aerosol deposition in mouse models.

PubMed ID: 31917627

MeSH Terms: No MeSH terms associated with this publication