Skip Navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

Use this QR code to view the newest version of this document
Use this QR code to view the newest version of this document

Your Environment. Your Health.

Publication Detail

Title: Differential effects of two lots of aroclor 1254 on enzyme induction, thyroid hormones, and oxidative stress.

Authors: Burgin, D E; Diliberto, J J; Derr-Yellin, E C; Kannan, N; Kodavanti, P R; Birnbaum, L S

Published In Environ Health Perspect, (2001 Nov)

Abstract: Aroclor 1254 is a commercial mixture of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), which is defined as being 54% chlorine by weight. However, the congener composition varies from lot to lot. Two lots which have been used in toxicity studies, 124-191 and 6024 (AccuStandard), were analyzed for their congener composition. Lot 6024 has approximately 10 times the dioxin toxic equivalents (TEQ) of lot 124-191. The purpose of this study was to determine if the difference in the TEQ of the two lots explains the different in vivo responses seen on a weight basis. Male Long-Evans rats (70 days old) were treated orally with a single dose of 0-1,000 mg/kg of each lot. Hepatic ethoxy-, methoxy-, and pentoxyresorufin O-deethylase (EROD, MROD, and PROD, respectively) activities as well as serum thyroxine (T(4)) concentrations and measures of oxidative stress were determined 4 days after treatment. Results, on a weight basis, indicate that lot 6024 led to a greater induction of EROD, MROD, and PROD but not total T(4) reduction. The differences in TEQ between the lots explained the differential induction of EROD and MROD but did not account for the induction of PROD nor decreases in T(4). PROD induction is not due to dioxin-like congeners, whereas the decrease in serum T(4) levels may involve multiple mechanisms. Effects on the antioxidants ascorbic acid and uric acid were seen only at the highest mass dose for both lots and were not explained by the difference in TEQ. These results illustrate that the differences in the TEQ explain the differences in the strict dioxin-like effects (EROD, MROD induction), but the non-dioxin-like congeners cause other effects that are not associated with the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (e.g., PROD). In addition, supra-additive effects also occur in the mixture (T(4), oxidative stress). Thus, current results demonstrate that overall toxicity cannot be predicted on the basis of the TEQ values. It is also critical that the lot number is reported in studies conducted with Aroclor 1254 because the congener composition and therefore the effects observed can be very different.

PubMed ID: 11713002 Exiting the NIEHS site

MeSH Terms: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antithyroid Agents/adverse effects*; Chlorodiphenyl (54% Chlorine)/adverse effects*; Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A1/drug effects; Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A1/metabolism*; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2B1/drug effects; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2B1/metabolism*; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System/drug effects; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System/metabolism*; Enzyme Induction; Isomerism; Liver/drug effects; Liver/enzymology; Male; Oxidative Stress*; Oxidoreductases/drug effects; Oxidoreductases/metabolism*; Rats; Rats, Long-Evans; Reproducibility of Results; Thyroxine/blood*; Thyroxine/drug effects

Back
to Top