Skip Navigation

Climate Change and Human Health Literature Portal Application of the US decision support tool for materials and waste management

Climate Change and Human Health Literature Portal

Thorneloe SA, Weitz K, Jambeck J
2007
Waste Management (New York, N.Y.). 27 (8): 1006-1020

The US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) launched the Resource Conservation Challenge (RCC) in 2002 to help reduce waste and move towards more sustainable resource consumption. The objective of the RCC is to help communities, industries, and the public think in terms of materials management rather than waste disposal. Reducing cost, finding more efficient and effective strategies to manage municipal waste, and thinking in terms of materials management requires a holistic approach that considers life-cycle environmental tradeoffs. The US EPA's National Risk Management Research Laboratory has led the development of a municipal solid waste decision support tool (MSW-DST). The computer software can be used to calculate life-cycle environmental tradeoffs and full costs of different waste management or materials recovery programs. The environmental methodology is based on the use of life-cycle assessment and the cost methodology is based on the use of full-cost accounting. Life-cycle inventory (LCI) environmental impacts and costs are calculated from the point of collection, handling, transport, treatment, and disposal. For any materials that are recovered for recycling, offsets are calculated to reflect potential emissions savings from use of virgin materials. The use of the MSW-DST provides a standardized format and consistent basis to compare alternatives. This paper provides an illustration of how the MSW-DST can be used by evaluating ten management strategies for a hypothetical medium-sized community to compare the life-cycle environmental and cost tradeoffs. The LCI results from the MSW-DST are then used as inputs into another US EPA tool, the Tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts, to convert the LCI results into impact indicators. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate how the MSW-DST can be used to identify and balance multiple criteria (costs and environmental impacts) when evaluating options for materials and waste management. This type of approach is needed in identifying strategies that lead to reduced waste and more sustainable resource consumption. This helps to meet the goals established in the US EPA's Resource Conservation Challenge.

Expand Abstract

Resource Description

    Air Pollution, Other Exposure, Specify
    • Air Pollution, Other Exposure, Specify: Particulate Matter, Other Air Pollution, Specify
      • Particulate Matter, Other Air Pollution, Specify: SOx; NOx
      Air Pollution (other)
    General Geographic Feature
    United States
    Cancer, Other Health Impact, Specify
    • Cancer, Other Health Impact, Specify: toxicity
    Cost/Economic Impact Prediction, Outcome Change Prediction, Other Model/Methodology Type, Specify
    • Cost/Economic Impact Prediction, Outcome Change Prediction, Other Model/Methodology Type, Specify: municipal solid waste decision support tool MSW-DST; Full-accounting approach (FCA);Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts (TRACI)
    Inter-Annual (1-10 years)
    Research Article
    Mitigation
    • Mitigation : Adaptation Co-Benefit/Co-Harm
    • Mitigation : Mitigation Co-Benefit/Co-Harm
Back
to Top