Study Attribute | Value |
---|---|
CEBS Accession Number: | 002-03251-0022-0000-7 |
Chemical Name: | Cell Phone Radiation: GSM |
CASRN: | CELLPRADGSM |
NTP Study Type: | Genetic Toxicology - Micronucleus |
NTP Study ID: | G08013B |
Strain and Species: | Harlan Sprague Dawley Rat |
Study Result: | Male: Negative; Female: Negative |
Blood
Start Date | Sample Collection Time | Sex | Methodology Used | Route | Dosing Regimen |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012-12-20 | 1 hour | Male | Flow Cytometry | Whole Body Exposure | Whole Body Exposure x 94, 94 day |
Dose (w/kg) |
Animal Number |
Polychromatic Erythrocytes Trend P: 0.9853836145969832 |
Normochromatic Erythrocytes Trend P: 0.9108250564306494 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. Examined | Total MN Cells | Percent PCE | MN Cells per 1000 |
No. Examined | Total MN Cells | Percent NCE | MN Cells per 1000 |
||||
Vehicle Control | Air | 0 |
507 | 20000 | 16 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1971224 | 466 | 99.0 | 0.2 |
0 |
526 | 20000 | 23 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 2011588 | 1378 | 99.0 | 0.7 | ||
0 |
556 | 20000 | 19 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 2206832 | 373 | 99.1 | 0.2 | ||
0 |
590 | 20000 | 14 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 2570711 | 1232 | 99.2 | 0.5 | ||
0 |
603 | 20000 | 12 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1849505 | 181 | 98.9 | 0.1 | ||
Average ± SEM | 0.946 ± 0.051 | 0.840 ± 0.097 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.334 ± 0.109 | |||||||
Test Chemical | Cell Phone Radiation: GSM | 1.5 |
711 | 20000 | 9 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 1846736 | 505 | 98.9 | 0.3 |
1.5 |
741 | 20000 | 8 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1831386 | 202 | 98.9 | 0.1 | ||
1.5 |
745 | 20000 | 18 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1982489 | 326 | 99.0 | 0.2 | ||
1.5 |
746 | 20000 | 17 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 2136221 | 218 | 99.1 | 0.1 | ||
1.5 |
794 | 20000 | 9 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 1827680 | 116 | 98.9 | 0.1 | ||
Average ± SEM | 1.032 ± 0.030 | 0.610 ± 0.109 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.143 ± 0.036 | Pairwise P | 0.920 | 1.000 | ||||
Test Chemical | Cell Phone Radiation: GSM | 3 |
1025 | 20000 | 13 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1884453 | 113 | 98.9 | 0.1 |
3 |
922 | 20000 | 6 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1935701 | 117 | 99.0 | 0.1 | ||
3 |
952 | 20000 | 10 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 1788080 | 213 | 98.9 | 0.1 | ||
3 |
958 | 20000 | 12 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 2621710 | 119 | 99.2 | 0.0 | ||
3 |
967 | 20000 | 19 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1863071 | 208 | 98.9 | 0.1 | ||
Average ± SEM | 1.000 ± 0.062 | 0.600 ± 0.106 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.079 ± 0.015 | Pairwise P | 0.961 | 1.000 | ||||
Test Chemical | Cell Phone Radiation: GSM | 6 |
1185 | 20000 | 8 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1865990 | 355 | 98.9 | 0.2 |
6 |
1204 | 20000 | 8 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 1527258 | 104 | 98.7 | 0.1 | ||
6 |
1216 | 20000 | 14 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 2012506 | 230 | 99.0 | 0.1 | ||
6 |
1232 | 20000 | 6 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1784338 | 215 | 98.9 | 0.1 | ||
6 |
1233 | 20000 | 13 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 2048732 | 322 | 99.0 | 0.2 | ||
Average ± SEM | 1.082 ± 0.058 | 0.490 ± 0.078 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.130 ± 0.021 | Pairwise P | 0.972 | 1.000 | ||||
Blood
Start Date | Sample Collection Time | Sex | Methodology Used | Route | Dosing Regimen |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012-12-20 | 1 hour | Female | Flow Cytometry | Whole Body Exposure | Whole Body Exposure x 94, 94 day |
Dose (w/kg) |
Animal Number |
Polychromatic Erythrocytes Trend P: 0.5656051266288146 |
Normochromatic Erythrocytes Trend P: 0.7373049830651437 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. Examined | Total MN Cells | Percent PCE | MN Cells per 1000 |
No. Examined | Total MN Cells | Percent NCE | MN Cells per 1000 |
||||
Vehicle Control | Air | 0 |
617 | 20000 | 15 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 3898448 | 1190 | 99.5 | 0.3 |
0 |
638 | 20000 | 13 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 2877599 | 249 | 99.3 | 0.1 | ||
0 |
640 | 20000 | 9 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 2702727 | 240 | 99.3 | 0.1 | ||
0 |
662 | 20000 | 16 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 4292188 | 437 | 99.5 | 0.1 | ||
0 |
702 | 20000 | 9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 2213602 | 165 | 99.1 | 0.1 | ||
Average ± SEM | 0.659 ± 0.078 | 0.620 ± 0.073 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.131 ± 0.044 | |||||||
Test Chemical | Cell Phone Radiation: GSM | 1.5 |
850 | 20000 | 6 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 2157807 | 455 | 99.1 | 0.2 |
1.5 |
867 | 20000 | 17 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 2305102 | 794 | 99.1 | 0.3 | ||
1.5 |
886 | 20000 | 13 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 3922604 | 457 | 99.5 | 0.1 | ||
1.5 |
903 | 20000 | 16 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 2809231 | 440 | 99.3 | 0.2 | ||
1.5 |
906 | 20000 | 9 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 2397131 | 441 | 99.2 | 0.2 | ||
Average ± SEM | 0.764 ± 0.073 | 0.610 ± 0.104 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.202 ± 0.039 | Pairwise P | 0.519 | 0.377 | ||||
Test Chemical | Cell Phone Radiation: GSM | 3 |
1047 | 20000 | 18 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 2487713 | 332 | 99.2 | 0.1 |
3 |
1049 | 20000 | 18 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 2621788 | 363 | 99.2 | 0.1 | ||
3 |
1060 | 20000 | 12 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 3261376 | 424 | 99.4 | 0.1 | ||
3 |
1072 | 20000 | 10 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1913281 | 113 | 99.0 | 0.1 | ||
3 |
1082 | 20000 | 12 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 4075005 | 367 | 99.5 | 0.1 | ||
Average ± SEM | 0.737 ± 0.092 | 0.700 ± 0.084 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.110 ± 0.015 | Pairwise P | 0.495 | 0.447 | ||||
Test Chemical | Cell Phone Radiation: GSM | 6 |
1236 | 20000 | 11 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1787369 | 194 | 98.9 | 0.1 |
6 |
1239 | 20000 | 13 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 2116086 | 466 | 99.1 | 0.2 | ||
6 |
1285 | 20000 | 16 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 2098685 | 337 | 99.1 | 0.2 | ||
6 |
1313 | 20000 | 11 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1934785 | 174 | 99.0 | 0.1 | ||
6 |
1314 | 20000 | 8 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 2086174 | 121 | 99.1 | 0.1 | ||
Average ± SEM | 0.992 ± 0.033 | 0.590 ± 0.066 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 0.127 ± 0.029 | Pairwise P | 0.525 | 0.476 | ||||