Skip Navigation

Publication Detail

Title: A new baseline scoring system may help to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors: Shen, Xuedong; Nair, Chandra K; Aronow, Wilbert S; Holmberg, Mak J; Reddy, Madhu; Anand, Kishley; Hee, Tom; Chen, Aimin; Fang, Xiang; Maciejewski, Stephanie; Esterbrooks, Dennis J

Published In Arch Med Sci, (2011 Aug)

Abstract: The PROSPECT trial reported no single echocardiographic measurement of dyssynchrony is recommended to improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).In 100 consecutive patients who received CRT, we analyzed 27 ECG and echocardiographic variables to predict a positive response to CRT defined as a left ventricular (LV) end systolic volume decrease of ≥ 15% after CRT.Right ventricular (RV) pacing-induced left bundle branch block (LBBB), time difference between LV ejection measured by tissue Doppler and pulsed wave Doppler (T(TDI-PW)), and wall motion score index (WMSI) were significantly associated with positive CRT response by multivariate regression. We assigned 1 point for RV pacing-induced LBBB, 1 point for WMSI ≤ 1.59, and 2 points for T(TDI-PW) > 50 ms. Overall mean response score was 1.79 ±1.39. Cutoff point for response score to predict positive response to CRT was > 2 by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Area under ROC curve was 0.97 (p = 0.0001). Cardiac resynchronization therapy responders in patients with response score > 2 and ≤ 2 were 36/38 (95%) and 7/62 (11%, p < 0.001), respectively. After age and gender adjustment, the response score was related to CRT response (OR = 45.4, p < 0.0001).A response score generated from clinical, ECG and echocardiographic variables may be a useful predictor for CRT response. However, this needs to be validated.

PubMed ID: 22291798 Exiting the NIEHS site

MeSH Terms: No MeSH terms associated with this publication

Back
to Top
Last Reviewed: October 07, 2024