Skip Navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

Use this QR code to view the newest version of this document
Use this QR code to view the newest version of this document

Your Environment. Your Health.

Publication Detail

Title: Cattle-associated risk factors for human tuberculosis in rural livestock-keeping communities, Uganda.

Authors: Meisner, Julianne; Curtis, Kellie; Graham, Thomas W; Apamaku, Michael B; Manhart, Lisa E; Rabinowitz, Peter M

Published In Zoonoses Public Health, (2019 02)

Abstract: Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading infectious cause of human death worldwide. In cattle, TB infection results in productivity losses, trade barriers and zoonotic transmission via milk, meat or direct contact. We conducted a cross-sectional study in rural communities in Uganda between 2014 and 2016 to evaluate the association between tuberculosis skin test (TST) positivity in humans and cattle-associated risk factors: household herd positivity and raw milk consumption. Human and cattle TSTs were performed in communities followed by a survey of household practices. TST data were available on 493 humans, 184 (37.3%) with positive results, and 1,441 cattle, 50 (3.5%) with positive results. We fit separate log binomial generalized estimating equation models for the herd positivity-human TST positivity association, stratified on sex; and for the raw milk consumption-human TST positivity association, stratified on frequency of milk consumption. Having at least one TST-positive bovid in the household's herd was significantly associated with lower risk of TB among men (prevalence ratio [PR] 0.66, 95% CI 0.49, 0.87) but was not significantly associated with TB among women (PR 1.21, 95% CI 0.76, 1.95). This apparent protective effect was contrary to our a priori hypothesis of higher exposure effect among men, the primary caretakers of cattle. This finding may be the result of residual confounding by socioeconomic status; wealthier individuals may be less likely to be TB positive, but more likely to have TST-positive herds by virtue of larger herd sizes, ability to purchase new and possibly infected stock, and propensity to keep more TB-susceptible European breeds. For raw milk consumption, effect estimates were close to one and not statistically significant. Thus, in settings where bovine TB prevalence is low, such as Uganda, cattle-associated zoonotic transmission may be rare, and cattle-associated risk factors may not be important drivers of human TB burden.

PubMed ID: 30474360 Exiting the NIEHS site

MeSH Terms: No MeSH terms associated with this publication

Back
to Top