Title: ICD-9 CM code 333.1 as an identifier of patients with essential tremor: a study of the positive predictive value of this code.

Authors: Louis, Elan D; Applegate, Lakeisha M; Rios, Eileen

Published In Neuroepidemiology, (2007)

Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: Health outcomes research often uses administrative databases. Patients with the diseases of interest are identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9 CM) codes. The utility of the code for essential tremor (ET), 333.1, remains untested. We determined the positive predictive value (PPV) of the code 333.1. METHODS: Patients with the ICD-9 CM code 333.1 were identified from billing records at the Neurological Institute of New York. Their medical records were reviewed to determine whether they met Consensus Criteria for ET. RESULTS: Of 964 patients who carried the code 333.1, only 472 met diagnostic criteria for ET (i.e. PPV = 49.0%). The additional use of ICD 9-CM codes for parkinsonism and dystonia (as exclusionary criteria) only marginally improved this value (57.8%). Common diagnoses among the false positives were Parkinson's disease, dystonia, enhanced physiological tremor, drug-induced tremor, orthostatic tremor, and psychogenic tremor. Patients seen by general neurologists (vs. movement disorder specialists) were half as likely to meet diagnostic criteria for ET (34.6 vs. 51.9%, OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.23-0.70, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The code 333.1 performed poorly when attempting to identify ET cases. Given the very high prevalence of ET, a unique diagnostic code would seem to be in order.

PubMed ID: 17579284

MeSH Terms: Essential Tremor/classification*; Essential Tremor/diagnosis*; Humans; International Classification of Diseases/standards*; Medical Records/standards; Predictive Value of Tests; Retrospective Studies