Skip Navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.


The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Your Environment. Your Health.

Publication Detail

Title: A post-hoc Unweighted Analysis of Counter-Matched Case-Control Data.

Authors: Rakovski, Cyril; Langholz, Bryan

Published In Int J Biostat, (2015 Nov)

Abstract: Informative sampling based on counter-matching risk set subjects on exposure correlated with a variable of interest has been shown to be an efficient alternative to simple random sampling; however, the opposite is true when correlation between the two covariates is absent. Thus, the counter-matching design will entail substantial gains in statistical efficiency compared to simple random sampling at a first stage of analyses focused by design on variables correlated with the counter-matching variable but will lose efficiency at a second stage of analyses aimed at variables independent of the counter-matching variable and not conceived as a part of the initial study. In an effort to recover efficiency in such second stage of analyses scenarios, we considered a naive analysis of the effect of a dichotomous covariate on the disease rates in the population that ignores the underlying counter-matching sampling design. We derive analytical expressions for the bias and variance and show that when the counter-matching and the new dichotomous variable of interest are uncorrelated and a multiplicative main effects model holds, such an analysis is advantageous over the standard "weighted" approach, especially when the counter-matching variable is rare and in such scenarios the efficiency gains exceeds 80%. Moreover, we consider all possible conceptual violations of the required assumptions and show that moderate departures from the above-mentioned requirements lead to negligible levels of bias; numerical values for the bias under common scenarios are provided. The method is illustrated via an analysis of BRCA1/2 deleterious mutations in the radiation treatment counter-matched WECARE study of second breast cancer.

PubMed ID: 26351961 Exiting the NIEHS site

MeSH Terms: Asthma/epidemiology*; Asthma/pathology; Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology*; Breast Neoplasms/pathology; Case-Control Studies*; Female; Humans; Likelihood Functions; Male; Models, Statistical; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology*; Nuclear Weapons; Proportional Hazards Models; Silicosis/epidemiology; Silicosis/physiopathology; Statistics as Topic

to Top