Skip Navigation
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Your Environment. Your Health.

Progress Reports: Boston University: Administrative Core

Superfund Research Program

Administrative Core

Project Leader: David H. Sherr
Co-Investigators: Wendy J. Heiger-Bernays, Madeleine Kangsen Scammell, David M. Ozonoff
Grant Number: P42ES007381
Funding Period: 1995-2021
View this project in the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT)

Learn More About the Grantee

Visit the grantee's eNewsletter page Visit the grantee's eNewsletter page Visit the grantee's Twitter page View the grantee's Factsheet(377KB)

Progress Reports

Year:   2019  2018  2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 

The Administrative Core is responsible for organizing approximately monthly meetings of all SRP investigators, staff, and core leaders. Topics addressed in the regular meetings have included reviews of the project leaders’ research; new opportunities for collaboration among projects/cores and investigators; recent publications; and other items of scientific interest. At these meetings, core members regularly review ongoing work involving Research Translation and plan the direction in which that core is being developed.

In early 2010, the Administrative Core coordinated the program's SRP P42 reapplication. It provided support to all project leaders on the new application format, coordinated all paperwork, held frequent meetings to discuss collaboration, and organized a full-scale Mock Peer Review two months prior to the deadline. Outside reviewers from the Brown University SRP, the Dean of the BU School of Public Health, the Chair of the Environmental Health Department, colleagues outside the SRP system, and all project leaders served as either primary or secondary reviewers, using the R01 template, scoring system, and reviewable criteria. Each was asked to pay special attention to the mission, goals, and objectives of the overall NIEHS SRP program. The objective of having project leaders evaluate related projects was to require them to see the program through the eyes of a reviewer, judging the science not only on its standalone quality, but also its relation to the mission of the SRP program. After the review, leaders had five weeks to respond to criticisms and make adjustments that allowed a tighter integration with other projects. Much new collaboration was started as a result of this process. As a training exercise, all advanced graduate students, postdocs, and young investigators were invited to participate in the written reviews and observe the study section meeting and discussion. Results were compiled by the Administrative Core for use by project leaders and reviewed by Dr. Ozonoff (Chair of the session), who worked on follow-up with each project.

Researchers are continuing to use and build their internal website in order to increase intergroup communication. The Community Outreach and Research Translation Cores use this tool extensively. An internal wiki is currently being used to develop a training manual for a Community Outreach Core project.

Back
to Top